Letter to the Commission on the Need for External Evaluation of the IPA CSF and TACSO Project

Macedonian and Serbian CSOs and Institutions Exchange Experience on the New Laws on Association
July 7, 2010
Letter to the Commission on the Need for External Evaluation of the IPA CSF and TACSO Project
July 26, 2010

As of 2nd June, 2010, the Commission announced (through the TACSO website) that there will be no external evaluation to the project. It is not clear whether or when there would be an evaluation of the other two components of the Facility, i.e. P2P and Partnership Action. On 5th June, 2009 (i.e. over one year ago), our network approached the Commission on the need to better include local CSOs in the programming and implementation of the IPA Civil Society Facility with the letter The Chance for a Real Partnership: Civil Society Facility as a Motor for Support to Grounded Democratic Reforms in the Western Balkans”. The letter turned into a process of exchange of views and dialogue through series of meetings, workshops, conferences and input of the network experience through the participation in the TACSO Steering/Programming Committee.

Taking into consideration that the Facility and especially the TACSO project have raised high hopes among the CSOs, but also consequently criticism on its design and implementation, we deem it a minimum standard that an external evaluation of the TACSO project, but also of the whole Facility, is conducted before making decision on future of all Facility’s components as of 2010 programming year.

An external evaluation is the best way to enable input from all stakeholders, for mostly CSOs as the final beneficiaries and expected agents of sustainability and ownership of the Facility. Moreover, such an evaluation should enable objective as possible assessment of the so far results and input for the future direction of the Facility vis-a-vis all components and national vs. multi-beneficiary activities. The full letter is available here.

Moreover, BCSDN proposes a Blueprint centered around principles of coherence, ownership, sustainability and (cost-)effectiveness for the future programming and implementation of the Facility.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Select the fields to be shown. Others will be hidden. Drag and drop to rearrange the order.
  • Image
  • Description
  • Content
Compare